I was reading with interest Subroto Bagchi's blog and the article on IT meltdown and the IT jobs. This article can be read in full at http://www.mindtree.com/subrotobagchi/of-the-melt-down-it-jobs/
He is of the opinion that there has to be consideration to the people in the bottom of the pyramid which is close to 5% of the total workforce, who are non-performers. We need to try all ways and means to retain these people and see them thru the rough times. But another article by Geoff Colvin, wherein he is of the opnion that we should not carry on underperformers for long, as they tend to pull the performers down along with them and the company would be not able to reward the performers, whereby we would be loosing them.
Opposite thoughts, but both make sense. I am trying to strike a fine balance between the 2.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment